Τι πραγματικά θέλουν οι «φίλοι της Συρίας»;
Εγγραφο
της DIA, της
αμερικανικής υπηρεσίας πληροφοριών ( δόθηκε στη δημοσιότητα στις 18 Μαϊου του 20015 με βάση το Νόμο περί ελευθερίας της πληροφόρησης,Freedom Of Information Act) δίνει μια εντελώς διαφορετική εικόνα των δυνάμεων κατά του Ασαντ,των συμμάχων τους και των πραγματικών στοχεύσεων τους,απο αυτή που μέχρι σήμερα μας έδιναν και ως ένα βαθμό συνεχίζουν να δίνουν τα αμερικανικά και τα διεθνή ΜΜΕ
''Εάν η κατάσταση γίνει ανεξέλεκτη τότε υπάρχει η δυνατότητα εγκαθίδρυσης ενός κανονικού ή άτυπου πριγκιπάτου (ΣτΜ.χαλιφάτο) σαλαφιστών στην Ανατολική Συρία (Hasaka και Der Zor), και αυτό ακριβώς θέλουν οι δυνάμεις που υποστηρίζουν την αντιπολίτευση'' .
Έκθεση της DIA,της Στρατιωτικής Υπηρεσίας Πληροφοριών των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών : Η Δύση θα διευκολύνει την άνοδο του ισλαμικού κράτους ", προκειμένου να απομονωθεί το καθεστώς της Συρίας
CONSIDERS DISSENTERS LIKE IRAN AND IRAQ.
E. AQI CONSIDERS THÈ SUNNI ISSUE IN IRAQ TO BE FATEFULLY CONNECTED
TO THÈ SUNNI ARABS AND MUSLIMS.
4. <6) THÈ BORDERS:
A. THÈ BORDERS BETWEEN SYRIA AND IRAQ STRETCH APPROXIMATELY 600KM
WITH COMPLEX TERRAIN CONSISTTNG OF A VAST DESERT, MOUNTAIN RANGES
(SINJAR MOUNTAINS), JOINT RIVERS (FLOWING ON BOTH SIDES). AND
AGRICULTURAL LANDS.
WITH COMPLEX TERRAIN CONSISTTNG OF A VAST DESERT, MOUNTAIN RANGES
(SINJAR MOUNTAINS), JOINT RIVERS (FLOWING ON BOTH SIDES). AND
AGRICULTURAL LANDS.
B. IRAQ
DIRECTLY NEIGHBORS THÈ SYRIAN PROVINCES OF HASAKA AND DER
ZOR, AS WELL AS (SYRIANÌ C1TIES ADJACENTTO THÈ IRAQI BORDER.
ZOR, AS WELL AS (SYRIANÌ C1TIES ADJACENTTO THÈ IRAQI BORDER.
C. THÈ LAND ON BOTH SIDES BETWEEN IRAQ AND SYRIA IS A VAST DESERT
PUNCTUATED BY VALLEYS, AND IT LACKS TRANSPORTATION ROUTES, WITH THÈ
EXCEPTION OF THÈ INTERNATIONAL HIGHWAY AND SOME MAJOR CITIES.
PUNCTUATED BY VALLEYS, AND IT LACKS TRANSPORTATION ROUTES, WITH THÈ
EXCEPTION OF THÈ INTERNATIONAL HIGHWAY AND SOME MAJOR CITIES.
5. (€} THÈ POPULATION LIVING ON THÈ BORDER:
A. THÈ POPULATION LIVING ON THÈ BORDER HAS A SOCIAL-TRIBAL STYLE,
WHICH IS BOUND BY STRONG TRIBAL AND FAMILIAL MARITAL TIES.
WHICH IS BOUND BY STRONG TRIBAL AND FAMILIAL MARITAL TIES.
B. THEIR
SECTARIAN AFFIL1ATION UNITES THÈ TWO
SIDES WHEN EVENTS
HAPPEN IN THÈ REGION.
HAPPEN IN THÈ REGION.
C. AQI HAD MAJOR POCKETS AND BASES ON BOTH SIDES OF THÈ BORDER TO
FACILITATE THÈ FLOW OF MATERIEL AND RECRUITS.
D. THERE WAS A
REGRESSION OF AQI IN THÈ WESTERN PROVINCES OF
IRAQ
DURING ΉΓΕ YEARS OF 2009 AND 2010; HOWEVER, AFTER THÈ RISE OF THÈ
INSURGENCY IN SYRIA, THÈ REUGIOUS AND TRIBAL POWERS IN THÈ REGIONS
BEGAN TO SYMPATHIZE WITH THÈ SECTARIAN UPRISING. THIS (SYMPATHY)
APPEARED IN FRIDAY PRAYER SERMONS, WHICH CALLED FOR VOLUNTEERS TO
SUPPORT THÈ SUNNI'S IN SYRIA.
DURING ΉΓΕ YEARS OF 2009 AND 2010; HOWEVER, AFTER THÈ RISE OF THÈ
INSURGENCY IN SYRIA, THÈ REUGIOUS AND TRIBAL POWERS IN THÈ REGIONS
BEGAN TO SYMPATHIZE WITH THÈ SECTARIAN UPRISING. THIS (SYMPATHY)
APPEARED IN FRIDAY PRAYER SERMONS, WHICH CALLED FOR VOLUNTEERS TO
SUPPORT THÈ SUNNI'S IN SYRIA.
6. & THÈ
SITUATION ON THÈ IRAQI AND SYRIAN BORDER:
A. THREE BORDER BDES ARE
SUFFICIENT TO CONTROL THÈ BORDERS DURING PEACE
TIME FOR OBSERVATION DUTIES
AND TO PREVENT SMUGGLTNG AND 1NFILTRATIOR
(b,n;Sec-1. 4(c)
|
C. ÌN PREVIOUS YEARS A MAJORITY OF AQI FIGHTERS ENTERED IRAQ
PRIMARILY VIA THÈ SYRIAN BORDER.
7. (6) THÈ FUTURE ASSUMPTIONS OF THÈ CRISIS:
A. THÈ REGIME WILL SURVIVE AND HAVE CONTROL OVER SYRIAN
TERRITORY.
14-L-0552/DIA/
B. DEVELOPMENT OF THÈ CURRENT EVENTS INTO PROXY WAR:
WITH SUPPORT FROM RUSSIA, CHÌNA, AND IRAN, THÈ REGIME 1S CONTROLLINO THÈ AREAS OF INFLUENCE
ALONG COASTAL TERRITORIES (TARTUS AND LATAKIA), AND IS FIERCELY DEFENDING HOMS, WHICH IS CONSIDERED TUE PRIMARY TRANSPORTATION ROUTE IN SYRIA. ON THÈ OTHER HAND, OPPOSniON FORCES ARE TRYING TO CONTROL THÈ EASTERN AREAS (HASAKA AND DER
ZOR), ADJACENT TO THÈ WESTERN IRAQI PROVINCES (MOSUL AND ANBAR), IN ADDITION TO NEIGHBORING TURKISH BORDHRS. WESTERN
COUNTRIES, THÈ GULF STATES AND TURKEY ARE SUPPORTING THESE EFFORTS. THIS
HYPOTHESIS IS MOST LIKELY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THÈ DATA FROM RECENT EVENTS, WHICH
WILL HELP PREPARE SAFE HAVENS UNDER INTERNATIONAL
SHELTERING, SIMILAR TO WHAT TRANSPIRED IN
LIBYA WHEN BENGHAZI WAS CHOSEN AS
TUE COMMAND CENTER OF THÈ TEMPORARY GOVERNMENT.
8. (Θ* THÈ EFFECTS ON IRAQ:
|
i. -I
(ci
|
JSYRIAN REGIME BORDER FORCES
RETREATED FROM THÈ BORDER AND THÈ OPPOSITION FORCES (SYRIAN FREE ARMY) TOOK OVER THÈ POSTS AND RAISED THEIR FLAG. THÈ
IRAQJ BORDER GUARD FORCES ARE FACING A BORDER
WITH SYRIA THAT IS NOT
GUARDED BY OFFICIAL ELEMENTS WHICH
PRESENTS A DANGEROUS AND SERIOUS THREAT.
B THÈ OPPOSITION FORCES WILL TRY TO USE THÈ IRAQI TERRITORY AS A SAFE HAVEN FOR ITS FORCES
TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THÈ SYMPATHY OF THÈ IRAQI
BORDER POPULATION, MEANWHILE TRYING TO RECRUIT FIGHTERS AND TRAIN THEM ON THÈ IRAQI SIDE, IN ADDITION TO HARBORING
REFUGEES (SYRIA).
C. IF THÈ SITUATION UNRAVELS
THERE IS THÈ POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING
A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA
(HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THÈ SUPPORTING POWERS
TO THÈ OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE TUE SYRIAN REGIME, WHICH
IS CONSIDERED THÈ STRATEGIC DEPTH OF THÈ SHIA EXPANSION (IRAQ AND
IRAN).
A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA
(HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THÈ SUPPORTING POWERS
TO THÈ OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE TUE SYRIAN REGIME, WHICH
IS CONSIDERED THÈ STRATEGIC DEPTH OF THÈ SHIA EXPANSION (IRAQ AND
IRAN).
D. THÈ DETERIORATION OF THÈ SITUATION HAS DIRE CONSEQUENCES ON THÈ
IRAQI SITUATION AND ARE AS FOLLOWS:
IRAQI SITUATION AND ARE AS FOLLOWS:
-1. THIS CREATES THÈ
IDEAL ATMOSPHERE FOR AQI TO RETURN TO ITS OLD POCKETS IN MOSUL AND RAMADL AND WILL PROVIDE A RENEWED MOMENTUM UNDER THÈ PRESUMPTION OF UNIFYING THÈ JIHAD AMONG SUNNI IRAQ
AND SYRIA, AND THÈ REST OF THÈ SUNN1S IN THÈ ARAB WORLD AGAINST WHAT IT CONSIDERS ONH ENEMY, THÈ DISSENTERS. IS( COULD ALSO
DECLARE AN ISLAMIC STATE TIIROUGH
ITS UNION WITH OTHER TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IN IRAQ
AND SYRIA, WHICH WILL CREATE GRAVE DANGER IN REGARDS TO UNIFYING IRAQ AND THÈ PROTECTION OF ITS TERRITORY.
 |
4-L-Q552/DIA/291
|
iX3):10 USO § 424
(bKDSec. 1 4 fé)
|
-3. THÈ
RENEWING FACILITATION OF TERRORIST ELEMENTS FROM ALL OVER THÈ
ARAB WORLD ENTERING INTO IRAQI ARENA.
(t>X1) Sec 1 4 (c).(b)(3):10 USC § 424.(bp:50 LJ8C § 30240)[b)(3>1OUSC§-t24
14-L-0552/DIA/292
l(b)(3):1DUSC{j424
(bX3)10USC§424
BT
#3497
NNNN
CLASSIFICAT1ON: SECRET
14-L-0552/DIA/293
 |
||
 |
||
ΠΗΓΗ : http://levantreport.com/2015/05/19/2012-defense-intelligence-agency-document-west-will-facilitate-rise-of-islamic-state-in-order-to-isolate-the-syrian-regime/
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-defense-state-department-documents-reveal-obama-administration-knew-that-al-qaeda-terrorists-had-planned-benghazi-attack-10-days-in-advance/
και http://angryarab.blogspot.gr/2015/05/so-what-do-friends-of-syria-really-want.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/05/21/us-mideast-crisis-turkey-arms-idUSKBN0O61L220150521
On Monday, May 18, the conservative government watchdog group Judicial Watch published a selection of formerly classified documents obtained from the U.S. Department of Defense and State Department through a federal lawsuit.
While initial mainstream media reporting is focused on the White House’s handling of the Benghazi consulate attack, a much “bigger picture” admission and confirmation is contained in one of the Defense Intelligence Agency documents circulated in 2012: that an ‘Islamic State’ is desired in Eastern Syria to effect the West’s policies in the region.
Astoundingly, the newly declassified report states that for “THE WEST, GULF COUNTRIES, AND TURKEY [WHO] SUPPORT THE [SYRIAN] OPPOSITION… THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO THE OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE SYRIAN REGIME…”.
The DIA report, formerly classified “SECRET//NOFORN” and dated August 12, 2012, was circulated widely among various government agencies, including CENTCOM, the CIA, FBI, DHS, NGA, State Dept., and many others.
The document shows that as early as 2012, U.S. intelligence predicted the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS), but instead of clearly delineating the group as an enemy, the report envisions the terror group as a U.S. strategic asset.
While a number of analysts and journalists have documented long ago the role of western intelligence agencies in the formation and training of the armed opposition in Syria, this is the highest level internal U.S. intelligence confirmation of the theory that western governments fundamentally see ISIS as their own tool for regime change in Syria. The document matter-of-factly states just that scenario.
Forensic evidence, video evidence, as well as recent admissions of high-level officials involved (see former Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford’s admissions here and here), have since proven the State Department and CIA’s material support of ISIS terrorists on the Syrian battlefield going back to at least 2012 and 2013 (for a clear example of “forensic evidence”: see UK-based Conflict Armament Research’s report which traced the origins of Croatian anti-tank rockets recovered from ISIS fighters back to a Saudi/CIA joint program via identifiable serial numbers).
The newly released DIA report makes the following summary points concerning “ISI” (in 2012 “Islamic State in Iraq,”) and the soon to emerge ISIS:
…
THE GENERAL SITUATION:
A. INTERNALLY, EVENTS ARE TAKING A CLEAR SECTARIAN DIRECTION.
B. THE SALAFIST [sic], THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND AQI ARE THE MAJOR FORCES DRIVING THE INSURGENCY IN SYRIA.
C. THE WEST, GULF COUNTRIES, AND TURKEY SUPPORT THE OPPOSITION; WHILE RUSSIA, CHINA AND IRAN SUPPORT THE REGIME.
…
3.
(C)Al QAEDA – IRAQ (AQI):… B. AQI SUPPORTED THE SYRIAN OPPOSITION FROM THE BEGINNING, BOTH IDEOLOGICALLY AND THROUGH THE MEDIA…
…
4.D. THERE WAS A REGRESSION OF AQI IN THE WESTERN PROVINCES OF IRAQ DURING THE YEARS OF 2009 AND 2010; HOWEVER, AFTER THE RISE OF THE INSURGENCY IN SYRIA, THE RELIGIOUS AND TRIBAL POWERS IN THE REGIONS BEGAN TO SYMPATHIZE WITH THE SECTARIAN UPRISING. THIS (SYMPATHY) APPEARED IN FRIDAY PRAYER SERMONS, WHICH CALLED FOR VOLUNTEERS TO SUPPORT THE SUNNI’S [sic] IN SYRIA.
…
7.
(C)THE FUTURE ASSUMPTIONS OF THE CRISIS:
A. THE REGIME WILL SURVIVE AND HAVE CONTROL OVER SYRIAN TERRITORY.
B. DEVELOPMENT OF THE CURRENT EVENTS INTO PROXY WAR: …OPPOSITION FORCES ARE TRYING TO CONTROL THE EASTERN AREAS (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), ADJACENT TO THE WESTERN IRAQI PROVINCES (MOSUL AND ANBAR), IN ADDITION TO NEIGHBORING TURKISH BORDERS. WESTERN COUNTRIES, THE GULF STATES AND TURKEY ARE SUPPORTING THESE EFFORTS. THIS HYPOTHESIS IS MOST LIKELY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DATA FROM RECENT EVENTS, WHICH WILL HELP PREPARE SAFE HAVENS UNDER INTERNATIONAL SHELTERING, SIMILAR TO WHAT TRANSPIRED IN LIBYA WHEN BENGHAZI WAS CHOSEN AS THE COMMAND CENTER OF THE TEMPORARY GOVERNMENT.
…
8.C. IF THE SITUATION UNRAVELS THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO THE OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE SYRIAN REGIME, WHICH IS CONSIDERED THE STRATEGIC DEPTH OF THE SHIA EXPANSION (IRAQ AND IRAN)
8.D.1. …ISI COULD ALSO DECLARE AN ISLAMIC STATE THROUGH ITS UNION WITH OTHER TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA, WHICH WILL CREATE GRAVE DANGER IN REGARDS TO UNIFYING IRAQ AND THE PROTECTION OF ITS TERRITORY.
While initial mainstream media reporting is focused on the White House’s handling of the Benghazi consulate attack, a much “bigger picture” admission and confirmation is contained in one of the Defense Intelligence Agency documents circulated in 2012: that an ‘Islamic State’ is desired in Eastern Syria to effect the West’s policies in the region.
Astoundingly, the newly declassified report states that for “THE WEST, GULF COUNTRIES, AND TURKEY [WHO] SUPPORT THE [SYRIAN] OPPOSITION… THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO THE OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE SYRIAN REGIME…”.
The DIA report, formerly classified “SECRET//NOFORN” and dated August 12, 2012, was circulated widely among various government agencies, including CENTCOM, the CIA, FBI, DHS, NGA, State Dept., and many others.
The document shows that as early as 2012, U.S. intelligence predicted the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS), but instead of clearly delineating the group as an enemy, the report envisions the terror group as a U.S. strategic asset.
While a number of analysts and journalists have documented long ago the role of western intelligence agencies in the formation and training of the armed opposition in Syria, this is the highest level internal U.S. intelligence confirmation of the theory that western governments fundamentally see ISIS as their own tool for regime change in Syria. The document matter-of-factly states just that scenario.
Forensic evidence, video evidence, as well as recent admissions of high-level officials involved (see former Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford’s admissions here and here), have since proven the State Department and CIA’s material support of ISIS terrorists on the Syrian battlefield going back to at least 2012 and 2013 (for a clear example of “forensic evidence”: see UK-based Conflict Armament Research’s report which traced the origins of Croatian anti-tank rockets recovered from ISIS fighters back to a Saudi/CIA joint program via identifiable serial numbers).
The newly released DIA report makes the following summary points concerning “ISI” (in 2012 “Islamic State in Iraq,”) and the soon to emerge ISIS:
- Al-Qaeda drives the opposition in Syria
- The West identifies with the opposition
- The establishment of a nascent Islamic State became a reality only with the rise of the Syrian insurgency (there is no mention of U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq as a catalyst for Islamic State’s rise, which is the contention of innumerable politicians and pundits; see section 4.D. below)
- The establishment of a “Salafist Principality” in Eastern Syria is “exactly” what the external powers supporting the opposition want (identified as “the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey”) in order to weaken the Assad government
- “Safe havens” are suggested in areas conquered by Islamic insurgents along the lines of the Libyan model (which translates to so-called no-fly zones as a first act of ‘humanitarian war'; see 7.B.)
- Iraq is identified with “Shia expansion” (8.C)
- A Sunni “Islamic State” could be devastating to “unifying Iraq” and could lead to “the renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena.” (see last non-redacted line in full PDF view.)
_____________________________________________
The following is excerpted from the seven page DIA declassified report (bold-facing is my own):
R 050839Z AUG 12…
THE GENERAL SITUATION:
A. INTERNALLY, EVENTS ARE TAKING A CLEAR SECTARIAN DIRECTION.
B. THE SALAFIST [sic], THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND AQI ARE THE MAJOR FORCES DRIVING THE INSURGENCY IN SYRIA.
C. THE WEST, GULF COUNTRIES, AND TURKEY SUPPORT THE OPPOSITION; WHILE RUSSIA, CHINA AND IRAN SUPPORT THE REGIME.
…
3.
…
4.D. THERE WAS A REGRESSION OF AQI IN THE WESTERN PROVINCES OF IRAQ DURING THE YEARS OF 2009 AND 2010; HOWEVER, AFTER THE RISE OF THE INSURGENCY IN SYRIA, THE RELIGIOUS AND TRIBAL POWERS IN THE REGIONS BEGAN TO SYMPATHIZE WITH THE SECTARIAN UPRISING. THIS (SYMPATHY) APPEARED IN FRIDAY PRAYER SERMONS, WHICH CALLED FOR VOLUNTEERS TO SUPPORT THE SUNNI’S [sic] IN SYRIA.
…
7.
A. THE REGIME WILL SURVIVE AND HAVE CONTROL OVER SYRIAN TERRITORY.
B. DEVELOPMENT OF THE CURRENT EVENTS INTO PROXY WAR: …OPPOSITION FORCES ARE TRYING TO CONTROL THE EASTERN AREAS (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), ADJACENT TO THE WESTERN IRAQI PROVINCES (MOSUL AND ANBAR), IN ADDITION TO NEIGHBORING TURKISH BORDERS. WESTERN COUNTRIES, THE GULF STATES AND TURKEY ARE SUPPORTING THESE EFFORTS. THIS HYPOTHESIS IS MOST LIKELY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DATA FROM RECENT EVENTS, WHICH WILL HELP PREPARE SAFE HAVENS UNDER INTERNATIONAL SHELTERING, SIMILAR TO WHAT TRANSPIRED IN LIBYA WHEN BENGHAZI WAS CHOSEN AS THE COMMAND CENTER OF THE TEMPORARY GOVERNMENT.
…
8.C. IF THE SITUATION UNRAVELS THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO THE OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE SYRIAN REGIME, WHICH IS CONSIDERED THE STRATEGIC DEPTH OF THE SHIA EXPANSION (IRAQ AND IRAN)
8.D.1. …ISI COULD ALSO DECLARE AN ISLAMIC STATE THROUGH ITS UNION WITH OTHER TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA, WHICH WILL CREATE GRAVE DANGER IN REGARDS TO UNIFYING IRAQ AND THE PROTECTION OF ITS TERRITORY.
Συνέχεια,για την πραγματική στρατηγική των ΗΠΑ (η δημιουργία χάους) σε Συρία,Ιράκ.
In effect, the fall of Ramadi is an orchestrated outgrowth of the “managed chaos” strategy.
''Η πτώση του Ραμάντι είναι η ενορχηστρωμένη έκβαση της στρατηγικής του "διαχειρίσιμου
χάους" .
από http://journal-neo.org/2015/05/23/ramadi-and-america-s-fracturing-of-iraq/ :
In effect, this ‘controlled chaos’ strategy promotes and extends, rather than concludes the war. Additionally, the allegation of US-ISIS collusion is further supported by dozens of accounts of airdropped US weapons being seized by ISIS. As Iraqi MP Majid al-Ghraoui noted in January, “The information that has reached us in the security and defense committee indicates that an American aircraft dropped a load of weapons and equipment to the ISIS group militants at the area of al-Dour in the province of Salahuddin… This incident is continuously happening and has also occurred in some other regions.”
Looking at a map, one begins to see then
that ISIS has received US support in each of the strategically
significant areas where it has made important gains. When reports of US
airdrops going to ISIS in the province of Salahuddin first emerged, it
coincided with the group’s military success in Tikrit. Now we see Ramadi
in the easternmost part of Anbar province has fallen within weeks of
more reports emerging of US-supplied arms being destined for ISIS in the al-Baqdadi region of Anbar.
Taken in total then, it seems that US
strategy has been to overtly attack ISIS while covertly supporting it.
Similarly, the US has claimed to be supporting, or at least collaborating
indirectly, with Shiite militias connected to Iran. At the very same
time, those militias have repeatedly claimed that US has bombed them
deliberately. Such seemingly contradictory military objectives lead to
the inescapable conclusion that US policy has been, and continues to be,
chaos and fomenting war. So for Washington to now claim that the fall
of Ramadi is somehow a major tragedy, that it represents a failure of
strategy, is utter disinformation. In effect, the fall of Ramadi is an
orchestrated outgrowth of the “managed chaos” strategy.
